Readers' Comments
I have a lot of comments and questions to respond to, and I'm afraid I don't have much time to even come close to answering all of them. Below are some comments from readers in normal font with my answers in italics.
So what's your favorite movie of 2002? Your worst? Best acting?
Best Movie of 2002: Road to Perdition
Worst Movie of 2002: Deuces Wild
Best Actor of 2002: Daniel Day-Lewis in Gangs of New York
Best Actress of 2002: Wait until I see Chicago, then I'll answer this one.
Best Supporting Actor of 2002: Paul Newman, Road to Perdition
Best Supporting Actress of 2002: Viola Davis, Solaris
Keep in mind, I have seen few films from this year, so take this for what it's worth.
I can tell from your reviews that you're not a big fan of blockbuster films. What reasons do you give for this?
Ugh. Yes, blockbusters are not my thing (usually). The major reason why is that they are dumbed down. Some critics believe this is because this is what the young audiences (especially the young male audiences) want. I think this is completely false. Dumbing down a movie is an easy way out. The blockbuster, the chick flick, the all-action, no substance, and the gross-out or the teen comedies are seen by so many (young) viewers in part because they have few other options. I think you'd get just as many people to see films as you do now, even if you add more substance to these films. In other words, the blockbuster is simplified to the audience that watches it, and this simplification is (in my opinion) unnecessary and undesirable.
Jerry Bruckheimer seems to be the main source (lately) for the dumbed down blockbuster (Pearl Harbor, e.g.). And what about this Kangaroo Jack? MY GOD! Now the extremely lame action/animated figure hero seems to be a source of inspiration (Thanks a lot, Spider-Man.). It's going to be a long summer.
Did you like the second Lord of the Rings better than the first? After watching the second film for the fourth time, I personally think it's better.
The answer is no. I think the second film drags a bit more than the first. I also did not like that so little focus was placed on Frodo and Sam. And I personally was annoyed by Gollum (especially his lengthy monologues). I've decided to wait on a review of this film until I watch the third film.
One thing that is a growing annoyance to me about these films is its rather blatant use of melodrama. I love how camera action adds so much drama to a scene, especially when a character has made a startling discovery or is saying something profound. Take the scene in The Two Towers where Legolas says, "White Wizard approaches."
What is your favorite moment made on film?
Too tough of a question. I can give you a list of several memorable moments, though.
-Paul Newman's final scene in Road to Perdition
-The bus accident scene in The Sweet Hereafter
-Vito Corleone's assassination attempt in The Godfather
-Vito Corleone's avenging Italy scene in The Godfather Part II
-The final dinner scene in The Godfather Part II
-The airport scene in Casablanca
-The tank chase in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
-Darth Vader/Luke Skywalker lightsaber battle in The Empire Strikes Back
-The final fifteen minutes of Casino
-The graveyard scene (the last scene) of Schindler's List
-The outdoor steps finale of Notorious
-Paul Newman's egg eating dare in Cool Hand Luke
-"God Bless America" in The Deer Hunter
-"Are you talking to me?" in Taxi Driver
-The last temptation of Christ in, well, The Last Temptation of Christ
-The avenging murder in In the Bedroom
There's just a few.
--
A couple of you have noted that convicts are sometimes given some time out of jail before they are sent off to prison (regarding my comment that Monty Brogan's reason for his final day of freedom is not given in 25th Hour). I was actually aware of this. An explanation as to why this was specifically given to Brogan, I feel, would have been unnecessary and inappropriate in the film. So, even though I mentioned that this was not explained in the film, I think it was appropriate that no explanation was given. That wasn't an issue of the film, and Spike Lee was at least aware of this.
--
How could you find so much entertainment out of a film as boring as About Schmidt?
Yes, the film is a quiet one. Not much excitement or exhilaration is caused by watching the film. That wasn't the point of the film, either. About Schmidt is so good because it so delicately presents its topic and so elegantly progresses the topic. I didn't find About Schmidt boring at all. It was intriguing because the film dares to present a character like this, such a simple man with a simple need, and the film succeeds because it so quietly points out something that we all have felt every once in a while. In a way, Warren Schmidt is the everyman (everywoman, too).
More comments coming soon. Thanks, and keep them coming!